Overview
Evaluate the quality of interactions with modern AI coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code, judging whether the model thinks like a strong engineer. This is not a production code role.
What you'll do
- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end
- Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think
- Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code
- Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)
- Give clear, opinionated written feedback on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading
- Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code
What you'll need
- Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
- Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python
- Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor
- Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
- Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line
- Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above)
- Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
- High bar for what good engineering looks like
Nice to have
- Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
- Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
Details
- Contract engagement, remote, worldwide (eligibility may vary by location)
- $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location
- 10-20 hours/week, flexible
- Ongoing duration; projects run from about two weeks to a few months, with new projects offered to evaluators who do well
- Start as soon as the take-home is cleared and a project has an open seat
- Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough; no interview
Read the full description and apply on the company’s own careers page.